Digg - Obama '08 iPhone App Is Grassroots Gadgety Perfection::
charliespopcan, on 10/03/2008, -17/+50hey obama supporters, obama voted for the . EntropyFan, on 10/03/2008, -3/+2So Obama had nothing to do with an App
http://digg.com/software/Obama_08_iPhone_App_Is_Grassroots_Gadgety_PerfectionHOME |
Nothing in his campaign is even close to the democratic party of FDR & Truman. He is a socialist no we have to put it stronger he is promoting communism. His MAIN PROGRAM that he admitted to last night again is INCOME EQUALIZATION may you poor yet educated people in college think this is good but this is America and soldiers have died fighting against communism and here the democratic party has a wanna be president that is proud of his programs and has supporters who think they are going to like a communistic society. Everyone is not equal so we do have the moral responsibility to ASSIST the poor but I do not and will not bring finances to be equal with them
republican tool working the propaganda machine, and spreading the non issues again,sorry you don't get to define us or our party. worry about your own right wing hate machine and let us stick to the real issues.
Because the media said so!
Call him what you want...I still support helping Americans over helping Iraqis....if that's socialist, so be it.
He's not stealing from the rich. He's returning some of the money they stole from the middle class under Bush.
United States of Obama - US Election - smh.com.au::
Invoking the legacies of Franklin Roosevelt, the war-time Democrat president, Some parts of Senator Obama's speech were dense with policy as he
http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/united-states-of-obama/2008/08/29/1219516735762.htmlHOME |
Obama's Campaign Manager Makes The Case - Marc Ambinder::
Dec 31, 2007 Obama is the only top Democratic candidate who strongly opposed the .. You think so, I'm Obama supporter and I will vote Huckabee first
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/12/obamas_campaign_manager_makes.phpHOME |
That's not socialism! That's justice!
I disagree with your question, Obama supporters are not dense. There was no admittance by Obama about income equalization, you should re-watch the debate.
They have taken the republicans to task on party themes. Republicans used to be for small government and reducing federal spending, but the past three republican presidents have spent more and increased the national debt more than any other presidents in the history of the USA.
Only Bill Clinton, democrat, has passed a balanced budget in the past thirty years. While that was occurring, the business in the US did very well.
As far as communism goes, it is the sitting Republican President George Bush that has initialed a federal bailout of Wall Street Investment Banks for their losses. It is this republican administration that are buying up banks. Why don't you see this? You cries of democrat communism are misplaced, they belong squarely on the shoulders of this republican presidency.
Why do the rich get to keep the profits and bonuses they made over the years, but the middle class has to bailout their losses?
Your are SELFISH and people like you are the reason why America is falling right now. GREED is on of the seven deadliest sins, for a reason.
OBOMMY THE COMMY....UNCLE JOE WOULD BE PROUD!! Obama tours not-so-friendly turf - Carrie Budoff Brown - Politico.com::
Aides and supporters were eager to note that Obama did not choose to stage rallies in Democratic cities such as St. Louis or Detroit.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10361.htmlHOME |
Truthdig - Reports - Why Obama Can Keep Gates::
and 2)Hillary was a good choice—maybe, but most Obama supporters do not seem to think so and 3)you see no value in not supporting one of he duopoly , in any
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20081120_why_obama_can_keep_gates/HOME |
I LOVE OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
thats all i have to say!
Exactly. You've got a bunch of people parading around under the Democrat label. Stop being cowards just come with your own Socialist Party. Stop trying to con the AMerican people. A Socialist Democrat won in Australia last time.
Ablex: Because why vote for a dishonest politician hiding behind the Democrat label trying to con people. Jeeze.
Why do you assume all Obama supporters are Democrats? Or are supporting him because they think he is a Democrat?
I don't give a rat's *** what label he uses. I think he is the best viable option for president.
as an ex democrat ..i see very few people today that know what the democrat party has stood for over the years..carter pretty much killed the party...now it is the socialist party.
after thinking about it a moment..Joe Lieberman was probably the last real democrat...so they kicked him out of the party
Why are you so dense as to think that everyone who votes for Obama cares what his party affiliation is?
Let's review your rant because it's a bit off base and I'm not sure you passed history. The Obama plan taxes the rich less than under those presidents--it is less progressive than their tax structures. Income redistribution has gone on since 1916 with debates over how it should be done and who it should favor--it's been the American way much longer than fighting communism has. We have a pretty clear answers from history--government can't leave the market alone and let it correct itself (1929 USA), and government can't take over production and control the economy (1989 USSR). Preserving the freedom of a market while protecting the workers who drive it seems to have had the most success.
Is Obama's 'redistributive" interview the GOP's 'October Surprise ::
He also noted that in the interview, Obama appears to express support for the Pubs think they're going to lose so everybody jumping ship 8 days out.
http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/denver/rockytalklive/archives/2008/10/is_obamas_resdistributive_inte.htmlHOME |
In short, democrats think that if a CEO of a major corporation makes about 300 times what his average worker does, that that is fairness. When he makes 500 times what his average worker does, he's a rich guy getting richer off the backs of the poor. Find me anywhere that Obama said the CEO of GM should make the same thing a line worker does, and you'd have a point. You can't--that isn't what he's about, and you are fooling yourself if you believe it.
And for Americans worried about their freedom--keep worrying. Neither of these candidates is forming a dictatorship. However, either of them will take away your individual freedoms a piece at a time when they feel it is best for the country--even though it almost never is. When they attack freedom, they will do it for your security. Keep your eyes open no matter who is elected, and take care to rein in your emotions about whatever disaster prompts their decision to limit your freedom for your own good. They will be counting on your anger to get you to accept losing your freedom.
it seems that Obama supporters are dense about a lot of things,
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
Evidently a new Democratic party is surfacing that is far more left than the Democrats of younger years. The younger generation is part of the problem. I've always been on the line between a Republican and a Democrat. There used to be a lot of beliefs and policies that I liked about them. But unfortunately I can't say that anymore. I think the "good" Democrats should rise up and over take the "bad' ones. Obama being in the latter category. No one really wants communism and if they think they do then it has to be pure ignorance. Why would anyone want to lose what we have held near and dear in America since the beginning? We are a democracy with freedoms that most other countries envy. Who would want to give those up so that government can dictate our every move?
the democratic party died many years ago.
Because they are blinded by their hate of Bush. These are not clear thinking compassionate people. These are people full of hate and venom. They are willing to elect a dangerous and unbalance man because of their
bitterness.
I don't know where you get your information, but income equalization is not part of the plan.
Raising taxes on the wealthy so they are paying their share is fair. Palin pays 10 - 15% tax, why should she get to pay less than those making less?
Oh, there you go again. Dense is the person who wrote this question ( your words ) No, just because you don't understand the issues it doesn't mean they are dense
No, he truly isn't a Dem. His policies are more socialist than Democratic. I don't understand how people think that his policies will wrok. Haven't they studied economics?
We are not.
You sound like another anger Mccain fan. Slinging mud and digging yourself deeper into it.
Your man is losing. Divert your anger into helping move our country forward.
So what if he "isn't a democrat" according to you...he still can do better than McCain. And let's face it, Obama's gonna win.
 Nortel Unveils Vision, Strategy for Israeli High-Performance Net
 Busy Friday Leads to Strong Close for Net Stocks |
PRINT
Add to favorites