Please support your opinions with facts.
If you wanted to support the opinion that it was you could do worse than to look at the handbill that starts ⠜You may depend, that those odious Miscreants⠦⠝. Violence was offered to the employees of the East India Company, you should also look at the backgrounds of the men who stood to gain most from the events ⠓ men who earned small fortunes from smuggling and political activists.
http://books.google.com/books?id=B3IFAAA...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en...
No. It threatened no one's life. It threatened no one physically. It was at worse an act of illegal entry and stealing.
No, it was not. Most common definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants. The Boston Tea Party was scrupulous in its protection of "non-combatants" -- no one at all was hurt or even threatened with harm.
The Boston Tea Party was an act of civil disobedience and vandalism, very like robbing a warehouse or storefront. Such things happen all the time and are not labeled terrorism.
The Tea Party was a lone act, an isolated event, and although it was carried out for an ideological goal (to emphasize that Americans refused to pay tax on tea, even to the point of refusing to allow the tea to be sold to them), it was not in any way meant or intended to cause terror in any sense of the word. The participants disguised themselves to prevent identification, but this is vastly different from the hooded Muslim terrorists who slice people's heads off. World Crisis Radio - Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth interview ::
World Crisis Radio - Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth interview Larry Silverstein even when they commit heinous acts of terrorism against Americans?
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4924HOME |
Montreal Resident Opens Fire: Who's Responsible? - Opinion::
Canadian police describe the situation as not being related to terrorism or racism Jay/Knapp (Boston Tea Party). Moore/Alexander (Socialist Party USA)
http://www.sbstatesman.com/news/2006/09/18/Opinion/Montreal.Resident.Opens.Fire.Whos.Responsible-2280817.shtmlHOME |
Piracy
Depends on your point of view. You should do your own homework, you wont learn if you do not
 Nortel Unveils Vision, Strategy for Israeli High-Performance Net
 Busy Friday Leads to Strong Close for Net Stocks |
